We are going to look at a problem
V ( x ) = { V L x ≤ x L v s.t. v < V m a x x L < x ≤ x R V R x > x R V(x)=\begin{cases}V_L &x\leq x_L\\ \text{$v$\quad s.t.\quad$v<V_{max}$} & x_L<x\leq x_R\\ V_R &x>x_R\end{cases} V ( x ) = ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ V L v s.t. v < V ma x V R x ≤ x L x L < x ≤ x R x > x R
A particle is fired from the left. Describe the J ( x ) J(x) J ( x ) of the particle in all states
Reflecting state
Extends Flow of Probability , Stationary States 1d
This is when
V L < E < V R V_L<E<V_R V L < E < V R
Let x R > x L x_R>x_L x R > x L
Let wave function ϕ ( x ) \phi(x) ϕ ( x ) be
ϕ ( x ) = { A e i k L x + B e − i k L x x < x L C e − b R x x > x R \phi(x) = \begin{cases} A e^{ik_L x} + B e^{-ik_L x} & x < x_L \\ C e^{-b_R x} & x > x_R \end{cases} ϕ ( x ) = { A e i k L x + B e − i k L x C e − b R x x < x L x > x R
If x L < x < x R x_L<x<x_R x L < x < x R , then ϕ ( x ) \phi(x) ϕ ( x ) is whatever solves TISE -- it doesn't really matter.
Let's examine the 1D stationary state in the reflecting state where E < V L , V R E<V_L, V_R E < V L , V R
In each region V V V is constant, the TISE
− ℏ 2 2 m d 2 ϕ d x 2 + V ϕ = E ϕ -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{d^2\phi}{dx^2}+V\phi=E\phi − 2 m ℏ 2 d x 2 d 2 ϕ + V ϕ = E ϕ
d 2 ϕ d x 2 = 2 m ( V − E ) ℏ 2 ϕ \frac{d^2\phi}{dx^2}=\frac{2m(V-E)}{\hbar^2}\phi d x 2 d 2 ϕ = ℏ 2 2 m ( V − E ) ϕ
Let
λ 2 ≜ 2 m ( V − E ) ℏ 2 ≜ c , ⇒ λ ≜ ± 2 m ( V − E ) ℏ ≜ ± c \lambda^2 \triangleq \frac{2m(V - E)}{\hbar^2}\triangleq c, \qquad\Rightarrow\qquad \lambda \triangleq \pm\frac{\sqrt{2m(V - E)}}{\hbar}\triangleq \pm\sqrt{c} λ 2 ≜ ℏ 2 2 m ( V − E ) ≜ c , ⇒ λ ≜ ± ℏ 2 m ( V − E ) ≜ ± c
So
d 2 ϕ d x 2 = λ 2 ϕ \frac{d^2\phi}{dx^2} = \lambda^2\,\phi d x 2 d 2 ϕ = λ 2 ϕ
This is an ODE. To solve we let
ϕ ( x ) = e ± λ x \phi(x)=e^{\pm \lambda x} ϕ ( x ) = e ± λ x
Let's try the negative case first. Let ϕ ( x ) ≜ e − λ x \phi(x)\triangleq e^{-\lambda x} ϕ ( x ) ≜ e − λ x
d 2 d x 2 e − λ x = d d x ( − λ e − λ x ) = ( − λ ) ( − λ ) e − λ x = ( − λ ) 2 e − λ x \frac{d^2}{dx^2}e^{-\lambda x} = \frac{d}{dx}\big(-\lambda\,e^{-\lambda x}\big) = (-\lambda)(-\lambda)\,e^{-\lambda x} = (-\lambda)^2 e^{-\lambda x} d x 2 d 2 e − λ x = d x d ( − λ e − λ x ) = ( − λ ) ( − λ ) e − λ x = ( − λ ) 2 e − λ x
⇒ d 2 ϕ d x 2 = λ 2 ϕ \Rightarrow\quad \frac{d^2\phi}{dx^2} = \lambda^2\,\phi ⇒ d x 2 d 2 ϕ = λ 2 ϕ
⇒ ( − λ ) 2 e − λ x = λ 2 ( e − λ x ) \Rightarrow\quad (-\lambda)^2 e^{-\lambda x} = \lambda^2\,(e^{-\lambda x}) ⇒ ( − λ ) 2 e − λ x = λ 2 ( e − λ x )
true
Let's try the positive case ϕ ( x ) ≜ e − λ x \phi(x)\triangleq e^{-\lambda x} ϕ ( x ) ≜ e − λ x
d 2 d x 2 e + λ x = d d x ( λ e + λ x ) = ( λ ) ( λ ) e + λ x = λ 2 e + λ x \frac{d^2}{dx^2}e^{+\lambda x} = \frac{d}{dx}\big(\lambda e^{+\lambda x}\big) = (\lambda)(\lambda)e^{+\lambda x} = \lambda^2 e^{+\lambda x} d x 2 d 2 e + λ x = d x d ( λ e + λ x ) = ( λ ) ( λ ) e + λ x = λ 2 e + λ x
⇒ ( + λ ) 2 e λ x = λ 2 ( e λ x ) \Rightarrow\quad (+\lambda)^2 e^{\lambda x} = \lambda^2\,(e^{\lambda x}) ⇒ ( + λ ) 2 e λ x = λ 2 ( e λ x )
also works.
The general solution is therefore
ϕ ( x ) = α e + λ x + β e − λ x \phi(x) = \alpha\,e^{+\lambda x} + \beta\,e^{-\lambda x} ϕ ( x ) = α e + λ x + β e − λ x
Solving For Cases
Case 1
Let's consider E > V L E>V_L E > V L
Recall that
λ 2 ≜ 2 m ( V − E ) ℏ 2 ≜ c \lambda^2 \triangleq \frac{2m(V - E)}{\hbar^2}\triangleq c λ 2 ≜ ℏ 2 2 m ( V − E ) ≜ c
Let V = V L V=V_L V = V L
V L − E < 0 V_L-E<0 V L − E < 0
so
λ 2 ≜ 2 m ( V L − E ) ℏ 2 < 0 \lambda^2 \triangleq \frac{2m(V_L - E)}{\hbar^2}<0 λ 2 ≜ ℏ 2 2 m ( V L − E ) < 0
λ 2 < 0 \lambda^2<0 λ 2 < 0
which means λ \lambda λ must be imaginary. Let k L k_L k L be real and positive
k L 2 ≜ − 2 m ( V L − E ) ℏ 2 > 0 ⇒ λ 2 = − k L 2 k_L^2 \triangleq -\frac{2m(V_L-E)}{\hbar^2} > 0 \quad\Rightarrow\quad \lambda^2 = -k_L^2 k L 2 ≜ − ℏ 2 2 m ( V L − E ) > 0 ⇒ λ 2 = − k L 2
λ = ± − k L 2 = ± − 1 k L 2 = ± i k L \lambda = \pm\sqrt{-k_L^2} = \pm\sqrt{-1}\,\sqrt{k_L^2} = \pm i\,k_L λ = ± − k L 2 = ± − 1 k L 2 = ± i k L
sub back into
ϕ ( x ) = e ± i k L x ⇒ ϕ ( x ) = A e i k L x + B e − i k L x \phi(x) = e^{\pm i k_L x} \quad\Rightarrow\quad \phi(x) = A e^{i k_L x} + B e^{-i k_L x} ϕ ( x ) = e ± i k L x ⇒ ϕ ( x ) = A e i k L x + B e − i k L x
Case 2
Consider E < V R E<V_R E < V R
So
V R − E > 0 V_R-E>0 V R − E > 0
so
λ 2 > 0 \lambda^2>0 λ 2 > 0
so it must be real. Let b R b_R b R be real and positive
b R 2 ≜ 2 m ( V R − E ) ℏ 2 > 0 ⇒ λ = ± b R 2 = ± b R b_R^2 \triangleq \frac{2m(V_R - E)}{\hbar^2} > 0 \quad\Rightarrow\quad \lambda = \pm\sqrt{b_R^2} = \pm b_R b R 2 ≜ ℏ 2 2 m ( V R − E ) > 0 ⇒ λ = ± b R 2 = ± b R
sub back into
ϕ ( x ) = D e + b R x + C e − b R x \phi(x) = D\,e^{+b_R x} + C\,e^{-b_R x} ϕ ( x ) = D e + b R x + C e − b R x
as x x x goes to + ∞ +\infty + ∞ then e + b R x e^{+b_Rx} e + b R x diverges unless α = 0 \alpha=0 α = 0
ϕ ( x ) = C e − b R x \phi(x) = C\,e^{-b_R x} ϕ ( x ) = C e − b R x
Working out Probability current
Working it out Probability Current J J J
Let
ω ≜ ϕ ∗ ∂ ϕ ∂ x \omega\triangleq \phi^*\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial x} ω ≜ ϕ ∗ ∂ x ∂ ϕ
ω ∗ = ω = − ( ω − ω ∗ ) = − 2 i I m ( ω ) \omega^*=\omega = -(\omega -\omega^*)=-2iIm(\omega) ω ∗ = ω = − ( ω − ω ∗ ) = − 2 i I m ( ω )
So from the definition of J
J ( x , t ) ≜ i ℏ 2 m ( ∂ ψ ∗ ∂ x ψ − ψ ∗ ∂ ψ ∂ x ) J(x,t) \triangleq \frac{i\hbar}{2m}\left(\frac{\partial\psi^*}{\partial x}\psi - \psi^*\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial x}\right) J ( x , t ) ≜ 2 m i ℏ ( ∂ x ∂ ψ ∗ ψ − ψ ∗ ∂ x ∂ ψ )
= i ℏ 2 m ( w ∗ − w ) = \frac{i\hbar}{2m}(w^* - w) = 2 m i ℏ ( w ∗ − w )
= i ℏ 2 m ( − 2 i I m ( w ) ) = ℏ m I m ( w ) = \frac{i\hbar}{2m}\big(-2i\,\mathbb{Im}(w)\big) = \frac{\hbar}{m}\mathbb{Im}(w) = 2 m i ℏ ( − 2 i I m ( w ) ) = m ℏ I m ( w )
= ℏ m I m ( ϕ ∗ d ϕ d x ) = \frac{\hbar}{m}\,\mathbb{Im}\!\left(\phi^*\frac{d\phi}{dx}\right) = m ℏ I m ( ϕ ∗ d x d ϕ )
Case 1
Let's consider E > V L E>V_L E > V L
d d x ϕ = i k L A e i k L x − i k L B e − i k L x \frac{d}{dx}\phi = ik_L A e^{ik_L x} - ik_L B e^{-ik_L x} d x d ϕ = i k L A e i k L x − i k L B e − i k L x
ϕ ∗ = A ∗ e − i k L x + B ∗ e i k L x \phi^* = A^* e^{-ik_L x} + B^* e^{ik_L x} ϕ ∗ = A ∗ e − i k L x + B ∗ e i k L x
ω = ϕ ∗ d d x ϕ = i k L ( ∣ A ∣ 2 − ∣ B ∣ 2 − A ∗ B e − 2 i k L x + A B ∗ e 2 i k L x ) \omega=\phi^* \frac{d}{dx}\phi = ik_L\Big(|A|^2 - |B|^2 - A^* B e^{-2ik_L x} + A B^* e^{2ik_L x}\Big) ω = ϕ ∗ d x d ϕ = i k L ( ∣ A ∣ 2 − ∣ B ∣ 2 − A ∗ B e − 2 i k L x + A B ∗ e 2 i k L x )
sub back to get
= ℏ m I m ( i k L ∣ A ∣ 2 − i k L ∣ B ∣ 2 ) = \frac{\hbar}{m}\,\mathbb{Im}\!\left(ik_L|A|^2-ik_L|B|^2\right) = m ℏ I m ( i k L ∣ A ∣ 2 − i k L ∣ B ∣ 2 )
= ℏ k L m ( ∣ A ∣ 2 − ∣ B ∣ 2 ) = \frac{\hbar k_L}{m}\left(|A|^2-|B|^2\right) = m ℏ k L ( ∣ A ∣ 2 − ∣ B ∣ 2 )
Case 2
Let's consider E < V R E<V_R E < V R
w = ϕ ∗ d d x ϕ = ( C ∗ e − b R x ) ( − b R C e − b R x ) = − b R ∣ C ∣ 2 e − 2 b R x w = \phi^*\frac{d}{dx}\phi = (C^*e^{-b_R x})(-b_R C e^{-b_R x}) = -b_R|C|^2 e^{-2b_R x} w = ϕ ∗ d x d ϕ = ( C ∗ e − b R x ) ( − b R C e − b R x ) = − b R ∣ C ∣ 2 e − 2 b R x
J = ℏ m I m ( − b R ∣ C ∣ 2 e − 2 b R x ) J = \frac{\hbar}{m}\,\mathbb{Im}\big(-b_R|C|^2 e^{-2b_R x}\big) J = m ℏ I m ( − b R ∣ C ∣ 2 e − 2 b R x )
= ℏ m ( 0 ) = 0 = \frac{\hbar}{m}(0) = 0 = m ℏ ( 0 ) = 0
Combining
That means the probability current J J J is this
J ( x , t ) = { ℏ k L m ( ∣ A ∣ 2 − ∣ B ∣ 2 ) x < x L 0 x > x R J(x,t) = \begin{cases} \dfrac{\hbar k_L}{m}\big(|A|^2 - |B|^2\big) & x < x_L \\[2mm] 0 & x > x_R \end{cases} J ( x , t ) = ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ m ℏ k L ( ∣ A ∣ 2 − ∣ B ∣ 2 ) 0 x < x L x > x R
The physical reason is that the right side is a dead end tail that transmit to nothing, so in steady state all incoming probabikity must be reflected back. Incoming flux is outgoing flux. ∣ A ∣ 2 = ∣ B ∣ 2 |A|^2=|B|^2 ∣ A ∣ 2 = ∣ B ∣ 2 must be true per Flow of Probability .
Scattering State
This is when
E > V L , V R E>V_L, V_R E > V L , V R
and we already know from Probability Current Problem 1 that
ϕ ( x ) = { A e i k L x + B e − i k L x x < x L C e i k R x + D e − i k R x x > x R \phi(x) = \begin{cases} A e^{ik_L x} + B e^{-ik_L x} & x < x_L \\ C e^{ik_R x} + De^{-ik_Rx} & x > x_R \end{cases} ϕ ( x ) = { A e i k L x + B e − i k L x C e i k R x + D e − i k R x x < x L x > x R
Note that x < x L x<x_L x < x L and x > x R x>x_R x > x R is like that because E > V L , V R E>V_L, V_R E > V L , V R
Because we're describing a particle fired from the left only, there is nothing coming in from right to left so D = 0 D=0 D = 0 .
so
J ( x , t ) = { ℏ k L m ( ∣ A ∣ 2 − ∣ B ∣ 2 ) x < x L ℏ k R m ∣ C ∣ 2 x > x R J(x,t) = \begin{cases} \frac{\hbar k_L}{m}\big(|A|^2 - |B|^2\big) & x < x_L \\ \frac{\hbar k_R}{m}|C|^2 & x > x_R \end{cases} J ( x , t ) = { m ℏ k L ( ∣ A ∣ 2 − ∣ B ∣ 2 ) m ℏ k R ∣ C ∣ 2 x < x L x > x R
Reflection wise Transmission Reflection Coefficients :
A is incident, B is reflected, C is transmitted
R = ∣ B ∣ 2 ∣ A ∣ 2 R = \frac{|B|^2}{|A|^2} R = ∣ A ∣ 2 ∣ B ∣ 2
T = k R ∣ C ∣ 2 k L ∣ A ∣ 2 , R + T = 1 T = \frac{k_R|C|^2}{k_L|A|^2}, \qquad R + T = 1 T = k L ∣ A ∣ 2 k R ∣ C ∣ 2 , R + T = 1
T > 0 T>0 T > 0 even if E < V m a x E<V_{max} E < V ma x which means a particle with less energy than the potential usually gets stuck. In quantum physics, it is possible for it to transmit through this barrier. This is known as quantum tunnelling
R > 0 R>0 R > 0
Bound State
This is when
E < V L , V R E<V_L, V_R E < V L , V R
so
ϕ ( x ) = { A e b R x + B e − b R x x < x L D e b R x + C e − b R x x > x R \phi(x) = \begin{cases} A e^{b_R x} + Be^{-b_Rx} & x < x_L \\ D e^{b_R x} + Ce^{-b_Rx} & x > x_R \end{cases} ϕ ( x ) = { A e b R x + B e − b R x D e b R x + C e − b R x x < x L x > x R
Left region, if x → − ∞ x\rightarrow -\infty x → − ∞ then the B B B term will blow up so B = 0 B=0 B = 0
Right region, if x → ∞ x\rightarrow \infty x → ∞ then the D D D term will blow up so D = 0 D=0 D = 0
ϕ ( x ) = { A e b R x x < x L C e − b R x x > x R \phi(x) = \begin{cases} A e^{b_R x}& x < x_L \\ Ce^{-b_Rx} & x > x_R \end{cases} ϕ ( x ) = { A e b R x C e − b R x x < x L x > x R
A bound state must decay to zero on both sides.
This means that energy is quantized for bound.
E ∈ { E 0 , E 1 , E 2 , … } E \in \{E_0, E_1, E_2, \dots\} E ∈ { E 0 , E 1 , E 2 , … }
this is because, as counterpoint if E E E is continuous, a wavefunction DNE in between the energies.
this is because the left tail A e b L x Ae^{b_Lx} A e b L x decays to 0 (is Evanescent ). Integrate the middle. You'd need a right tail that also decays so
d ϕ d x ( x R ) ϕ ( x R ) = − b R \frac{\frac{d \phi}{dx}(x_R)}{\phi(x_R)}=-b_R ϕ ( x R ) d x d ϕ ( x R ) = − b R
must be true. If it isn't true then D ≠ 0 D\neq 0 D = 0 needs to be drue but that blows it up.
Probability Current Problem 2